What the experts say
ESPN [$] (Jonathan Givony): 37th
The Ringer (Kevin O’Connor): 34th
Sports Illustrated (Jeremy Woo): 28th
Sporting News (Chris Stone): 29th
The Athletic [$] (Sam Vecenie): 40th
The Stepien (Composite Rank): 27th
The Step Back (Brandon Kleen): 30th
Quotes:
Having him 22nd on his most recent Big Board, Sports Illustrated’s Jeremy Woo noted the factors behind why he believes Fernando may carve out a role upon making it to the next level:
"“It was a banner year for Fernando’s growth, and even with Maryland’s inconsistencies, it’s apparent that his body type, physicality, motor and intangibles create a degree of long-term NBA floor for him. He should be ready to log some minutes right away, and fit into a less-demanding offensive role that better suits him. Many of the immediate concerns with Fernando’s game stem from occasionally stiff post-up play and turnover issues, but realistically, he’s not a guy you’ll want to run things through at the next level anyway. He’ll run the floor, won’t command extra touches, and should be able to turn himself into a useful rotation player who is willing to do the dirty work.”"
On the flip side, Sam Vecenie of The Athletic took on a more skeptical approach on why Fernando’s readiness may be an issue and the glut of big men that are littered around the league in his most recent mock draft:
"“Fernando is good, but what teams are starting to wonder if what exact role does he play in the NBA? He’s not much of a shooter right now, and his defensive awareness leaves something to be desired around the basket. He’s not a real switch guy on the perimeter defensively. He can certainly pass, which is great, and his IQ on that end is strong. He also has a nose for the basketball. But role questions are why you see Fernando slide to the second round here, as well as just the simple fact that the NBA has too many bigs.”"